- Project status
- Josie Dixon
- Institution web page
- Host institution
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre (CPEC), London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
- Team members
- Josie Dixon (CPEC, LSE) Klara Lorenz-Dant (CPEC, LSE) Margaret Dangoor (CPEC, LSE) Research Officer (CPEC, LSE, to be appointed) Sarah Russell (independent researcher/ expert) Daniel Casson (Care England) Martin Knapp (CPEC, LSE)
- Funding information (if funded)
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Policy Research Programme (PRP) - Recovery, Renewal, Reset: Research to inform policy responses to COVID-19 in the health and social care systems. Grant number: NIHR202482
- Project Summary
Visit-id: a study of care home visiting arrangements during Covid-19 is being conducted by a team from the Care Policy and Evaluation Centre (CPEC), London School of Economics and Political Science, led by Josie Dixon with Klara Lorenz-Dant, Margaret Dangoor and a researcher to be appointed, in collaboration with Sarah Russell, independent researcher/ expert, and Daniel Casson and his colleagues at Care England.
It is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Policy Research Programme as part of it’s Recovery, Renewal, Reset: Research to inform policy responses to COVID-19 in the health and social care systems funding call. It will run from January 2021 – April 2022 and is supported by a steering group involving senior representatives from Dementia UK, Alzheimer’s Society, Healthwatch, Carers UK, HC-One, Care England, Jewish Care, Freemantle Trust and Sheffield CCG and by a reference group of five experts-by-experience.
The study will examine how care homes in England have developed and implemented their visiting policies during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the factors that shape this. In particular, the study will identify range and diversity across care homes in:
- the content of visiting policies
- how visiting policies were developed
- how Government guidance on care home visiting has been interpreted and implemented
- how and to what degree scope in Government guidance for policies to take account of individual residents’ needs has been reflected in visiting policies
- the use of other support (e.g. non-Government guidance, practical tools, professional assistance) to develop and implement policies, and the role of local authority, or other local, advice and requirements
- in what ways the views and perspectives of residents, families and others have been taken into account when developing policies
- how policies have been communicated to residents, families and others, including what has worked well and less well
- experiences of implementing visiting policies, including views on the workability of policies; the acceptability of policies to residents, families and staff; and any equity or other impacts
Throughout, the researchers will identify the varied opportunities and challenges facing care homes in developing and implementing their policies, and identify aspects that have worked well and less well. Importantly, they will also identify the characteristics and circumstances of care homes, and other contextual factors, that have helped to shape care homes’ different approaches and experiences.
Stage 1: 200 care home managers (or a nominated senior member of staff) will complete an online questionnaire with ten questions inviting brief narrative answers (approximately 20-30 minutes to complete). We will also ask respondents to supply us with their written visiting policy, where they have one. Where relevant, questions about developing visiting policies will be directed to care home organisation managers.
Stage 2: In-depth interviews with senior staff in around 20 care homes/ care home organisations to further explore issues emerging from the survey.
Stage 3: In the final stage of the project we will speak to around 30 family carers of people living in care homes (recruited separately) to learn about their experiences and views of care home visiting policies.
- Outputs / Expected Outputs
To share our findings, we will produce a range of policy briefings, academic journal papers, blogs and webinars.
- United Kingdom
- Care setting
- Care homes/LTC facilities
- Funding type
- Implementation outcomes | Other | Quality of care | Social interaction | Wellbeing and quality of life
- Intervention types
- End of life care and advance care planning | Interventions to improve quality of care | Measures to compensate for isolation policies | Measures to support care provider organisations | Measures to support staff and unpaid carers | Other | Other measures to compensate for isolation policies | Other measures to support staff and unpaid carers | Use of technology | Visiting policies
- Document analysis | Policy analysis | Qualitative studies | Surveys
- Care partners of people living in LTCF | Care provider/care organisations | People living in care homes | People requiring end of life care | People with dementia | People with learning disabilities and autism | Staff working in long-term care | Unpaid carers