Site icon Resources to support community and institutional Long-Term Care responses to COVID-19

Article summary: Vaccine effectiveness after 1st and 2nd dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer/BioNTech) Covid-19 vaccine in long-term care facility residents and healthcare workers – a Danish cohort study (pre-print)

Study authors: Ida Rask Moustsen-Helms, Hanne-Dorthe Emborg, Jens Nielsen, Katrine Finderup Nielsen, Tyra Grove Krause, Kåre Mølbak, Karina Lauenborg Møller, Ann-Sofie Nicole Berthelsen, Palle Valentiner-Branth

The study:

This is a pre-print (not yet peer reviewed) of the first study to report vaccine effectiveness specifically for a long-term care facility population. The population-based cohort study assessed vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (developed by Pfizer/ BioNTech) in all Long-term Care Facilities (LTCF) residents and all Health Care Workers (HCW) in Denmark. This is also the first study to show VE estimates following 2nd dose.

A total of 39,040 LTCF residents and 331,039 HCW were included. Between 27 December 2020 and 18 February 2021, 95.2% and 86.0% of LTCF residents received their first and second dose, and 27.8% and 24.4% HCW received their first and second dose.

VE for confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection was estimated for both target groups for different time periods following the 1st and 2nd dose of the vaccine. The study used Poisson and Cox regressions to estimate respectively crude and calendar time-adjusted VE for the vaccine with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for vaccinated versus unvaccinated.

During the study period, there was increased focused testing in LTCF in Denmark and a national testing strategy was in place, with HCW offered weekly PCR-testing. The study therefore included almost all cases of SARS-CoV-2.

Key findings:

Study limitations reported by the authors:

A partial lockdown had been initiated prior to the start of the immunisation programme which might explain the higher VE observed in the unadjusted analysis. However, main results were calendar date-adjusted to address possible bias in the VE estimates due to differences in background risk.  

There was possible selection bias into early participation in the vaccination programme. Vaccinations were delayed in some facilities due to ongoing Covid-19 outbreaks, which may have inflated the observed vaccine effectiveness.

Social Care COVID Recovery and Resilience project view on the meaning of this study:

The authors further noted that, despite an observation of no or low vaccine effectiveness following one dose, “there was a short interval (median 24 and 25 days) between first and second dose, and therefore it is unlikely that the full impact of a single dose can be extrapolated from our findings”.

“Studies with a longer follow-up between first and second dose are warranted in order to explore potential advantages of a strategy with a postponed second dose”.

Summary by Sian Smith, Maximilian Salcher-Konrad, and Adelina Comas-Herrera, carried out as part of the Social Care COVID Recovery and Resilience Project (funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme (NIHR202333). The views expressed in this summary are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care).